1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 242 Cal.App.4th
  5. 242 Cal.App.4th 651 (2015)
 

RICHTEK USA, INC. v. UPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.

No. H039519.

242 Cal.App.4th 651 (2015)

195 Cal. Rptr. 3d 430

RICHTEK USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

November 24, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alston & Bird, Yitai Hu and Elizabeth H. Radar for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Hogan Lovells US, Steven M. Levitan, Clark S. Stone, Jennifer M. Lantz and Edward C. Kwok for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

Here, we confront the boundaries of the use of judicially noticed records in ruling on a demurrer. Utilizing judicially noticed documents in ruling on a demurrer is only proper when the documents are not used to determine disputed factual issues, such as the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases