PIELSTICK v. MIDFIRST BANK

No. B247106.

224 Cal.App.4th 1452 (2014)

169 Cal. Rptr. 3d 642

STEPHEN H. PIELSTICK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MIDFIRST BANK et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

March 26, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen H. Pielstick, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz, Richard I. Arshonsky and Jason J. Jarvis for Defendant and Respondent MidFirst Bank.

McCarthy & Holthus, Melissa Robbins Coutts and Gregory Belnap for Defendants and Respondents MidFirst Bank, Midland Financial Co., Quality Loan Service Corporation and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.


OPINION

CHAVEZ, J.

Stephen H. Pielstick (appellant) appeals from a judgment dismissing his second amended complaint (SAC) against MidFirst Bank (MidFirst), Midland Financial Company (Midland), and Quality Loan Service Corporation (Quality) (collectively respondents) with prejudice after the trial court sustained respondents' demurrer to the SAC without leave to amend.

Appellant's sole contention on appeal is that the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases