SABI v. STERLING

No. B205279.

183 Cal.App.4th 916 (2010)

ELISHEBA SABI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DONALD T. STERLING et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

April 8, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McDermott Will & Emery, Brandon J. Roker, Gregory R. Jones; Denise McGranahan; Brancart & Brancart, Christopher Brancart; and Catherine M. Bishop for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Farella Braun & Martel, Grace K. Won, Andrew W. Ingersoll, Monica Swanson Hunt; and Linda D. Kilb for Disability Rights Advocates, Disability Rights California, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Disability Rights Legal Center, Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, and Legal Aid Society—Employment Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Barbara Jones for AARP, Legal Services of Northern California, and National Senior Citizens Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Howrey, Constance F. Ramos and Michael C. Chou for Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Housing Rights Center, Inner City Law Center, Coalition for Economic Survival, Tenants Together, Tenderloin Housing Clinic, the Impact Fund and Public Counsel as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Klinedinst, G. Dale Britton, Gregory A. Garbacz; and Douglas L. Walton for Defendants and Respondents.

Pahl & McCay, Stephen D. Pahl, Karen K. McCay and Servando R. Sandoval for California Apartment Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Law Offices of Cummings Myer, Thomas B. Cummings and Audrey L. Myer for Apartment Association of Orange County as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Trevor A. Grimm and Craig Mordoh for California Apartment Law Information Foundation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

FLIER, J.

Appellant Elisheba Sabi brought an action alleging six causes of action against respondents Donald T. Sterling Corporation and Donald T. Sterling individually. The causes of action alleged that respondents violated the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) by discriminating against appellant because of her disability (first); California...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases