1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.4th
  4. 46 Cal.4th
  5. 46 Cal.4th 247 (2009)
 

KEENER v. JELD-WEN, INC.

No. S163430.

46 Cal.4th 247 (2009)

___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___

___ P.3d ___

THERESA KEENER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JELD-WEN, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California.

May 7, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McAtee Harmeyer, Jeff G. Harmeyer and Greg A. McAtee for Defendants and Appellants.

Reed Smith, Paul D. Fogel, Dennis Peter Maio; The Zucker Law Firm, Andrew J. Zucker; The Basile Law Firm and Jude Basile for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

GEORGE, C. J.—

We granted review to address issues concerning a trial court's polling of a civil jury pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 618 (hereafter section 618) after rendering a verdict. This statute provides that if "more than one-fourth of the jurors disagree" with a verdict upon polling, "the jury must be sent out again" for further deliberation, "but if no disagreement is expressed, the verdict is complete...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases