UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SFPP, L.P.

B199403

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SFPP, L.P. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Eight.

Not to be Published in the Official Reports


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mayer Brown, Neil M. Soltman, Donald M. Falk, and Michael F. Kerr for Defendants and Appellants.

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Craig S. Bloomgarden, Brent G. Cheney, and Benjamin G. Shatz for Plaintiff and Respondent.


COOPER, P. J.

We last considered this contract dispute between a pipeline and a railroad in 2003 when we reversed summary adjudication granted in favor of the Railroad. (Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. SFPP (Dec. 22, 2003) B160234 [nonpub. opn.] (Union Pacific I ).) We concluded that the phrase "[i]n the event the Railroad shall at any time deem it necessary . . . ." was ambiguous. We held that whether that phrase should be interpreted broadly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases