HARPER v. 24 HOUR FITNESS, INC.

No. B189272.

167 Cal.App.4th 966 (2008)

BRYAN HARPER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. 24 HOUR FITNESS, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

October 22, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Stephen Glick, Stephen Glick; Daniels, Fine, Israel & Schonbuch, Paul R. Fine, Scott A. Brooks; Law Offices of Ian Herzog, Ian Herzog and Evan D. Marshall for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, Susan Allison, Richard A. McDonald and Ryan S. Mauck for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

PERLUSS, P. J.

Putative class representatives Bryan Harper and Mark Salzwedel appeal from the trial court's order decertifying a limited class that had previously been recognized for their unfair competition claims under Business and Professions Code sections 17200 and 17500 (UCL claims)1 challenging a form contract 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., used to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases