SAVE TARA, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD, Defendant and Respondent;
WASET, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 30, 2008.
October 30, 2008.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chatten-Brown & Carstens, Jan Chatten-Brown, Douglas P. Carstens, Katherine A. Trisolini and Amy C. Minteer for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Law Offices of Michael W. Stamp and Michael W. Stamp for Save Our Carmel River and The Open Monterey Project as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Frank G. Wells Environmental Law Clinic, Sean B. Hecht; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County, David Pallack and Joshua Stehlik for Lincoln Place Tenants Association, People for Parks, Sierra Club and Trudy Saposhnek as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Rachel B. Hooper, Amy J. Bricker, Michelle W. Anderson; Law Offices of Donald B. Mooney and Donald B. Mooney for Environmental Defense Center, California Preservation Foundation, Planning and Conservation League and Natural Resources Defense Council as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Jenkins & Hogin, Michael Jenkins, John C. Cotti and Christi Hogin for Defendant and Respondent.
Aleshire & Wynder, David Aleshire and Joseph W. Pannone for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
Truman & Elliott, Kathleen O'Prey Truman and Todd Elliott for Housing California and Southern California Association of Nonprofit Housing as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.
Latham & Watkins, James L. Arnone, Stephanie E. Ord, Ernest J. Hahn and Benjamin J. Hanelin for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.
Supreme Court of California.
OPINION
WERDEGAR, J.
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.),1 a public agency must prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) on any project the agency proposes to "carry out or approve" if that project may have significant environmental effects (§§ 21100, subd. (a), 21151, subd. (a)). We address in this case the question whether and under what...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
