1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ADAMS v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS
 

ADAMS v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS

Civil Action No. 15-1543.

REGINALD ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL., Section: "E" (3), Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

August 12, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reginald Adams, Plaintiff, represented by Michael William Magner , Jones Walker, Alexander N. Breckinridge, V , Jones Walker, Benjamin S. Haley , Covington & Burling LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher M. Denig , Covington & Burling LLP, pro hac vice, David Sneed , Covington & Burling LLP, pro hac vice, Kimberley K. Allen , Covington & Burling LLP, pro hac vice, Micah John Fincher , Jones Walker, Robert D. Tilley , Covington & Burling LLP, pro hac vice, Tarak Anada , Jones Walker & Tina Mary Thomas , Covington & Burling LLP, pro hac vice.

New Orleans City, Defendant, represented by Corwin St. Raymond , City Attorney's Office, Cherrell Simms Taplin , City Attorney's Office, Churita H. Hansell , City Attorney's Office, Ewell Patrick Eagan , City Attorney's Office, Isaka R. Williams , City Attorney's Office, Kimlin Smith Lee , City Attorney's Office & Rebecca H. Dietz , City Attorney's Office.

Leon Cannizzaro, Jr, Defendant, represented by Thomas Jeffrey Barbera , Barbera Law Firm.

Sam Gebbia, Defendant, represented by Eric John Hessler , Eric J. Hessler, Attorney at Law.

Martin Venezia, Defendant, represented by John A. Venezia , Venezia & Associates APLC & Julie Elizabeth O'Shesky , Venezia & Associates APLC.

Frank Ruiz, Defendant, represented by Patrick J. Fanning , Patrick J. Fanning, Attorney at Law.

Jerry Ursin, Defendant, represented by Blake J. Arcuri , Usry, Weeks & Matthews & Freeman Rudolph Matthews , Usry, Weeks & Matthews.

Ronald Bodenheimer, Defendant, represented by Wiley J. Beevers , Beevers & Beevers, LLP & Steven Michael Mauterer , Beevers & Beevers, LLP.

ORDER AND REASONS

Before the Court are three motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Frank Ruiz, Jerry Ursin, and Martin Venezia, respectively.1 For the reasons that follow, Defendants' motions are DENIED.

BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases