1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SELDON v. MAGEDSON
 

SELDON v. MAGEDSON

No. CV-13-00072-PHX-DGC.

Philip Seldon, Plaintiff, v. Edward Magedson, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

April 15, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Seldon, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Xcentric Ventures LLC, Defendant, represented by David Scott Gingras , Gingras Law Office PLLC & Maria Crimi Speth , Jaburg & Wilk PC.

Cheyenne Crow, Defendant, Pro Se.

Irina Borisenko, Defendant, Pro Se.

ORDER

DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Philip Seldon has filed a motion to amend his first amended complaint. Doc. 45. Defendant Xcentric Ventures LLC ("Xcentric") has responded and no party has requested oral argument. The Court will deny the motion.

Xcentric has filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 38) The motion is fully briefed and no party has requested oral argument. The Court will grant the motion.

I. Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases