STUPP CORP. v. U.S.

Slip Op. 20-38 Consol. Court No. 15-00334.

435 F.Supp.3d 1307 (2020)

STUPP CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiffs, and Maverick Tube Corporation et al., Plaintiff-Intervenor and Consolidated Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and SeAH Steel Corporation et al., Defendant-Intervenors and Consolidated Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

March 24, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Wright Jameson , Schagrin Associates, of Washington, DC, for plaintiffs, consolidated plaintiff intervenors, and consolidated defendant intervenors Stupp Corporation, a Division of Stupp Bros., Inc. and Welspun Tubular LLC USA. With him was Roger Brian Schagrin.

Gregory James Spak , White & Case LLP, of Washington, DC, for plaintiff intervenor Maverick Tube Corporation, and for plaintiff, consolidated plaintiff intervenor, and defendant intervenor IPSCO Tubulars Inc. With him were Frank J. Schweitzer , Kristina Zissis , Luca Bertazzo , and Matthew W. Solomon .

Elizabeth Anne Speck , Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant. With her were Claudia Burke , Assistant Director, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Joseph H. Hunt , Acting Assistant Attorney General. Of Counsel was Reza Karamloo , Senior Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.

Jeffrey Michael Winton , Law Office of Jeffrey M. Winton PLLC, of Washington, DC, for defendant intervenor, consolidated plaintiff, and consolidated defendant intervenor SeAH Steel Corporation.

Jaehong David Park , Arnold & Porter LLP, of Washington, DC, for Hyundai Steel Company. With him was Henry D. Almond , Daniel Robert Wilson , and Kang Woo Lee . Of counsel was Phyllis L. Derrick .


OPINION AND ORDER

Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") second remand redetermination filed pursuant to the court's order in Stupp Corp. v. United States, 43 CIT ___, ___, 413 F.Supp.3d 1326, 1334 (2019) ("Stupp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases