1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 2 F.4th
  5. 2 F.4th 1150 (2021)
 

IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DROPBOX, INC.

No. 19-56347.

2 F.4th 1150 (2021)

IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DROPBOX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 20, 2021.

Amended July 6, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith J. Wesley (argued), Lori Sambol Brody , and Matthew L. Venezia , Brown George Ross LLP, Los Angeles, California; Alex Kozinski , Law Office of Alex Kozinski, Rancho Palos Verdes, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Beth S. Brinkmann (argued), Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C.; Clara J. Shin , Jeffrey M. Davidson , Matthew Q. Verdin , and Amy S. Heath , Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Defendant-Appellee Dropbox, Inc.'s petition for rehearing (Dkt. 65) is GRANTED. The Opinion filed on April 20, 2021 is amended by the Opinion filed concurrently with this Order.

The panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases