Defendants' evidence established that the property for which partition was sought was actually owned by AGV and not held by tenancy in common. Even if we consider, arguendo, the presumptions that a holder of title is the owner and that a property disposition to several persons creates a tenancy in common, the former was overcome by the rule that partnership property may be held in the name of a partner, as we noted on the prior appeal (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
VICK v. ALBERT
47 A.D.3d 482 (2008)
849 N.Y.S.2d 250
JONATHAN E. VICK et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD ALBERT et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. JONATHAN E. VICK et al., Respondents, v. RICHARD ALBERT et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 17, 2008.
Decided January 17, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.