Defendant's arguments concerning his conviction of second-degree weapon possession are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the evidence of defendant's intent to use the weapon unlawfully was legally sufficient in light of the statutory presumption of unlawful intent (Penal Law § 265.15 [4]), which the court properly submitted to the jury.
With respect to the conviction of third...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
