1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 41 A.D.3d
  5. 41 A.D.3d 594 (2007)
 

ZELAYA v. NEW YORK NEW YORK AUTO BODY, INC.

41 A.D.3d 594 (2007)

836 N.Y.S.2d 430

ERNESTO ZELAYA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK NEW YORK AUTO BODY, INC., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 12, 2007.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants contend that the Supreme Court erred in considering the causation testimony proffered by the plaintiff's medical expert. This contention, however, is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPLR 4017, 5501 [a] [3]). In light of the defendants' failure to raise a Frye objection (see Frye v United States, 293 F 1013 [1923]; see also Parker v Mobil Oil Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases