The plaintiff failed to preserve for appellate review her contentions that the defense counsel's cross-examination of one of her expert witnesses, as well as certain comments made by defense counsel about this witness in his summation, diverted the jurors' attention from the issues to be determined and deprived her of a fair trial (see Friedman v Marcus,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PELLO v. SYED
41 A.D.3d 568 (2007)
836 N.Y.S.2d 434
MARIANN PELLO, Appellant, v. RADHA SYED et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 12, 2007.
Decided June 12, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
