CITY OF OAK HARBOR v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INS.

No. 57959-2-I.

159 P.3d 422 (2007)

CITY OF OAK HARBOR, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered June 11, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Gottlieb, Betts Patterson Mines, P.S., Seattle, Counsel for Appellants.

Thomas Daniel Heffernan, Heffernan Law Firm PLLC, Redmond, Counsel for Respondents.


COX, J.

¶ 1 At issue is whether St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company met its burden to show there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding the application of its faulty work exclusion to the City of Oak Harbor's claim under its all-risks policy. Because this record shows there was no genuine issue of material fact and St. Paul was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.

¶ 2 In 2002, the City of Oak Harbor hired R & R Environmental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases