In light of the cooperative board's refusal to consent to plaintiffs' purchase of the subject apartment, plaintiffs were, pursuant to the terms of the parties' agreement, entitled to cancel the contract for the sale of the apartment and to the return of their escrowed down payment. The record does not indicate the reason for the board's refusal to give its consent, and defendant sellers have failed to come forward with any evidence
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROSENTHAL v. OAKES
41 A.D.3d 305 (2007)
837 N.Y.S.2d 564
DAVID ROSENTHAL et al., Respondents, v. JAMES OAKES et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 26, 2007.
Decided June 26, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
