Defendant's moving papers, seeking a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), were deficient in virtually every relevant respect. Among other defects, the moving papers failed to set forth whether the named witnesses would be willing to testify, the nature and materiality of the witnesses' anticipated testimony, and the manner in which they would be inconvenienced by a trial in New York County (see Gissen v Boy Scouts of Am.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROOT v. BROTMANN, ESQ.
41 A.D.3d 247 (2007)
836 N.Y.S.2d 874
MYRNA ROOT et al., Appellants, v. ANDREW K. BROTMANN, ESQ., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 19, 2007.
Decided June 19, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.