Although plaintiff, a stockholder and director of Medi-Bill, was not a party to the engagement letters by which Medi-Bill retained defendant to audit its financial statements, his relationship with defendant sufficiently approached privity to sustain his accounting malpractice claim as against defendant's contention that the claim must fail for lack of contractual privity (see Credit Alliance Corp. v Arthur Andersen & Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DINERSTEIN v. ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN, LLP
41 A.D.3d 167 (2007)
838 N.Y.S.2d 46
SIDNEY DINERSTEIN, Respondent, v. ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN, LLP, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff. MEDI-BILL ASSOCIATES, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 12, 2007.
Decided June 12, 2007.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
