GRANT v. GRANT


37 A.D.3d 167 (2007)

830 N.Y.S.2d 527

CAROL MULHOLLAND GRANT, Respondent, v. PAUL GRANT, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided February 1, 2007.


Defendant, who explicitly consented to the divorce on the basis of plaintiff's testimony at the 2002 inquest to which the parties stipulated, should be equitably estopped from taking an inconsistent position at this late juncture (see Dominguez v Dominguez, 255 A.D.2d 121 [1998]). In addition, although it appears that defendant, at the time of the inquest, was aware of the purported new...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases