INNES v. CARRASCOSA


918 A.2d 686 (2007)

391 N.J. Super. 453

Peter W. INNES, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Maria Jose CARRASCOSA, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 3, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan S. Lewis (Carter, Ledyard & Milburn) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Mark S. Carter, attorney; Mr. Carter, of counsel and on the brief; Kenneth S. Levine, New York, NY (Carter, Ledyard & Milburn) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, on the brief).

Peter Van Aulen, Saddle Brook, argued the cause for respondent (Law Offices of Peter Van Aulen, attorney, Mr. Van Aulen and Laura Van Tassel, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, COLLESTER and LYONS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

LYONS, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Every lawsuit affects some people. In this case, there are three persons who are primarily affected. The father of a six-year-old girl has not seen his daughter for over two years. The child's mother is incarcerated in New Jersey for failing to take steps to return the child from Spain. Most seriously affected, the young child of the couple, is in Spain without either her mother...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases