1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 46 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 742 (2006)
 

REGENCY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING v. CITY

No. S132619.

46 Cal.Rptr.3d 742 (2006)

39 Cal.4th 507

139 P.3d 119

REGENCY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

August 7, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Berger & Norton, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Michael M. Berger and Edward G. Burg, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Eduardo A. Angeles, Assistant City Attorney, and D. Timothy Dazé, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Sabine and Morrison and Randal R. Morrison, San Diego, for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

MORENO, J.

As part of a roadway beautification project in advance of the 2000 Democratic National Convention, the City of Los Angeles (City) planted a number of palm trees on City-owned property along a public street. Plaintiff Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Regency) claims that the trees made several of its roadside billboards less visible, at least as seen from particular perspectives along the boulevard. Regency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases