Ordered that the order dated February 14, 2006 is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated April 10, 2006 as denied the branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated April 10, 2006 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.