FRIDMAN v. KUCHER


34 A.D.3d 726 (2006)

826 N.Y.S.2d 104

DORA FRIDMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. STANISLAV KUCHER et al., Defendants. MIKHAIL ONTMAN, Plaintiff, v. DORA FRIDMAN, Defendant. OLEG KRASNYTSKY, Respondent, v. MIKHAIL ONTMAN et al., Defendants, and STANISLAV KUCHER et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 28, 2006.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion for summary judgment is denied.

Dora Fridman and Mikhail Ontman each had a 50% interest in certain real property. They entered into a contract to sell their interests to Oleg Krasnytsky (hereinafter the purchaser), which had a closing date "on or about" November 15, 2004. When that closing date passed, Ontman scheduled a closing for December 17, 2004 and notified the purchaser that "time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases