DIOMED, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC., Defendant.
Diomed, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
Vascular Solutions, Inc., Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 30, 2006.
August 30, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael A. Albert, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, for Diomed, Incorporated, Plaintiff.
William H. Bright, Jr., McCarter & English, LLP, Hartford, CT, for AngioDynamics, Incorporated, Defendant.
Rodney S. Dowell, Berman & Dowell, Boston, for AngioDynamics, Incorporated, Defendant.
Steven L. Feldman, Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C., Boston, for Vascular Solutions, Inc., AngioDynamics, Incorporated, Defendants.
James J. Foster, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, for Diomed, Incorporated, Plaintiff.
Mark D. Giarratana, McCarter & English, LLP, Hartford, CT, for AngioDynamics, Incorporated, Defendant.
Jason M. Honeyman, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, for Diomed, Incorporated, Plaintiff.
Michael N. Rader, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, for Diomed, Incorporated, Plaintiff.
Heather D. Redmond, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Vascular Solutions, Inc., Defendant.
Alexandra Stevens, McCarter & English, LLP, Stamford, CT, for AngioDynamics, Incorporated, Defendant.
John L. Strand, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, for Diomed, Incorporated, Plaintiff.
Merton E. Thompson, Burns & Levinson LLP, Boston, for Total Vein Solutions, LLC, Defendant.
Todd R. Trumpold, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Vascular Solutions, Inc., Defendant.
Karen L. Van Kooy, Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C., Boston, for Vascular Solutions, Inc., Defendant.
J. Thomas Vitt, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Vascular Solutions, Inc., Defendant.
Seth M. Wilson, McCarter & English, LLP, Hartford, CT, for AngioDynamics, Incorporated, Defendant.
William A. Zucker, McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, for New Star Lasers, Inc., Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in these consolidated patent cases are a motion to exclude expert testimony and several cross-motions for summary judgment.
I. Background
The plaintiff, Diomed, Inc. ("Diomed"), develops laser technology that is designed to treat varicose veins in a minimally invasive manner. It sells a product...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
