1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 34 A.D.3d
  5. 34 A.D.3d 265 (2006)
 

PEOPLE v. SPARBER

34 A.D.3d 265 (2006)

823 N.Y.S.2d 405

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL SPARBER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 9, 2006.

Although the court did not mention postrelease supervision (PRS) at any time during the plea or sentencing proceedings, its commitment sheet reflects that defendant's sentence includes a five-year term of PRS. While the court's failure to advise defendant of the PRS component of his sentence would be a ground for vacatur of the plea (People v Van Deusen, 7 N.Y.3d 744 [2006]; People v Catu, 4 N.Y.3d 242

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases