1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 34 A.D.3d
  5. 34 A.D.3d 253 (2006)
 

PEOPLE v. MATOS

34 A.D.3d 253 (2006)

823 N.Y.S.2d 148

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HECTOR MATOS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 9, 2006.

All of defendant's present arguments concerning admissibility of evidence, including his constitutional claims, are unpreserved (see e.g. People v Fleming, 70 N.Y.2d 947, 948 [1988]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. The record fails to support his assertion that these arguments should be considered preserved. Were we to review defendant's hearsay and Confrontation Clause challenges to a detective's testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases