IN RE RACHEL J.

No. 26768.

905 A.2d 1271 (2006)

97 Conn.App. 748

In re RACHEL J. et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 3, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Rigat, for the appellant (respondent mother).

Paula D. Sullivan, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

BISHOP, ROGERS and WEST, Js.


ROGERS, J.

The respondent mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights in R and N, her two minor children.1 On appeal, she claims that the court (1) improperly concluded that R sustained a serious bodily injury under General Statutes § 17a-112(j)(3)(F)2 and (2) erroneously found that it was in R's best interest to terminate the respondent's parental rights. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases