BARBLOCK v. BARBLOCK


890 A.2d 1005 (2006)

383 N.J. Super. 114

Paula BARBLOCK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joseph BARBLOCK, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 10, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Lomberg, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Lomberg & Del Vescovo, attorneys; Mr. Lomberg, of counsel and on the brief).

Steven M. Segalas, argued the cause for respondent (Damiano Law Offices, attorneys; Mr. Segalas, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, AXELRAD and SABATINO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

SABATINO, J.S.C., (temporarily assigned).

Defendant Joseph Barblock appeals the Family Part's order allowing his ex-wife, plaintiff Paula Barblock, to remove the parties' two minor children from New Jersey to the vicinity of Buffalo, New York. Defendant's main contention is that the trial court erred in failing to conduct a plenary hearing before granting plaintiff's removal application. Although we agree with defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases