KIMM v. BLISSET, LLC


905 A.2d 887 (2006)

388 N.J. Super. 14

Michael S. KIMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLISSET, LLC, Defendant-Respondent, and Roseanne Magliato, Nayda Magliato, Nayda's Salon, Inc. and On Set Transportation, Inc., Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 28, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael S. Kimm, appellant pro se.

Bonnist & Cutro, attorneys for respondent Blisset, LLC (James J. Cutro, on the brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, HOENS and R.B. COLEMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

HOENS, J.A.D.

This appeal raises questions of first impression concerning the scope of an arbitrator's powers. In addition, the appeal calls upon us to draw distinctions among arbitrations involving fee disputes between attorneys and their clients, arbitrations conducted in court-annexed proceedings, and arbitrations undertaken pursuant to private agreements. Finally, this appeal calls upon us to analyze the meaning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases