VEIT CO. v. LAKE COUNTY

No. A04-1958.

707 N.W.2d 725 (2006)

VEIT COMPANY, et al., Relators, v. LAKE COUNTY, Minnesota, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 17, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Y. Perry, Jason R. Asmus, Briggs and Morgan, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relators.

Michael J. Ford, John H. Wenker, Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A., St. Cloud, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge; DIETZEN, Judge; and HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

On appeal from the denial of relator applicants' application to amend their conditional-use permit, relators argue that their application was approved by operation of law because respondent county did not (1) provide relators a written statement of the reasons for denying the permit within the required statutory period; and (2) provide relators a written statement of the reasons for the denial that was consistent with the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases