1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 441 F.3d
  5. 441 F.3d 963 (2006)
 

KAO CORP. v. UNILEVER U.S., INC.

Nos. 05-1038, 05-1049.

441 F.3d 963 (2006)

KAO CORPORATION and THE ANDREW JERGENS COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. and CONOPCO, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 21, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur I. Neustadt, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Stephen G. Baxter and Richard L. Chinn.

George F. Pappas, Covington & Burling, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief was Kevin B. Collins. Of counsel were Scott C. Weidenfeller and Roderick R. McKelvie.

Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement. Defendants-Appellants Unilever United States, Inc., and Conopco, Inc. (collectively, "Unilever") and Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants Kao Corporation and The Andrew Jergens Company (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases