PER CURIAM.
The question before us is whether the trial court erred in limiting voir dire on the defense of necessity. We conclude that the answer is yes, and therefore order a new trial.
Joseph Stevens was charged with carrying a concealed firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The defense of defendant-appellant Stevens was that his life had been threatened and he armed himself for self defense.
Prior to trial, the court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.