1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 890 A.2d
  5. 890 A.2d 354 (2006)
 

LEVINE v. KONVITZ

890 A.2d 354 (2006)

383 N.J. Super. 1

Jeanette LEVINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip KONVITZ, Norman Konvitz, and Howard Walter, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick T. Collins, Bridgewater, argued the cause for appellant (Franzblau Dratch, attorneys; Mr. Collins, on the brief).

Gerard G. Brew, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (McCarter & English, attorneys; Mr. Brew, of counsel and on the brief; Alison Coriaty O'Sullivan, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, WECKER and FUENTES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to address whether cohabitation is an indispensable element of a cause of action seeking palimony support. The question arises in the context of the parties' extramarital romantic relationship, which spanned over seventy years. It is undisputed that they never cohabited during the entire period of their relationship.

As defendant was reaching the end of his life, plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases