KONAMI CORP. v. ROXOR GAMES, INC.

Civil Action No. 2:05cv173.

445 F.Supp.2d 725 (2006)

KONAMI CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant v. ROXOR GAMES, INC., a Texas corporation, and Mad Catz, Inc., a California corporation, and Redoctane, a California corporation, Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division.

August 7, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Flaim, Brian Charles McCormack, Baker & McKenzie, Dallas, TX, Allen Franklin Gardner, John Frederick Bufe, Michael Edwin Jones, Potter Minton PC, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant.

Marvin Craig Tyler, Brian Alden Dietzel, David John Palmer, Nicole W. Stafford, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Austin, TX, Gerald C. Conley, Tonya Michelle Gray, Andrews & Kurth, Dallas, TX, Whitney E. Peterson, Mad Catz Inc., San Deigo, CA, Jeffrey Kenton Lee, Kimberly A. Donovan, GCA Law Partners LLP, Mountain View, CA, for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This claim construction Opinion construes terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,410,835 ("the '835 patent"). Konami Corp. ("Konami") alleges Defendants Roxor Games, Inc. ("Roxor"), Mad Catz, Inc.("MadCatz"), and Redoctane ("RedOctane") (collectively "Defendants"), infringe the '835 patent.

The Patent

The '835 patent describes a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases