CLAREMONT POLICE OFFICERS ASS'N v. CITY OF CLAREMONT

No. S120546.

47 Cal.Rptr.3d 69 (2006)

39 Cal.4th 623

139 P.3d 532

CLAREMONT POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CLAREMONT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

August 14, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lackie & Dammeier, Dieter C. Dammeier and Michael A. Morguess, Upland, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rains, Lucia & Wilkinson and Alison Berry Wilkinson, Pleasant Hill, for Peace Officers Research Association of California's Legal Defense Fund as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, Richard M. Kreisler, Los Angeles, Mark H. Meyerhoff; Best Best & Krieger, Jeffrey V. Dunn, Sonia R. Carvalho, Irvine and Sandra M. Schwarzmann for Defendants and Respondents.

Alan L. Schlosser, Mark Schlosberg, San Francisco; and Peter Eliasberg, Los Angeles, for American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Jeffrey Kightlinger, Henry Barbosa, Henry Torres, Jr.; Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, James F. Baca, Warren S. Kinsler, Nate Kowalski and Joshua E. Morrison, Cerritos, for Metropolitan Water District of Southern California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Andrea J. Saltzman and Arthur A. Hartinger, Oakland, for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.


CHIN, J.

In this case, we consider a provision of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov.Code,1 § 3500 et seq.), which governs labor-management relations at the local government level. Section 3505 mutually obligates a public employer and an employee organization to meet and confer in good faith about a matter within the "scope of representation" concerning, among other things, "wages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases