1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 890 A.2d
  5. 890 A.2d 269 (2006)
 

DUNN v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N

890 A.2d 269 (2006)

2006 ME 4

David DUNN v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided: January 18, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward G. Dardis, Esq. (orally), Douglas Houston, Esq., Howard & Bowie, Damariscotta, for appellant.

Joanne B. Steneck, Esq. (orally), General Counsel, Public Utilities Commission, Augusta, William S. Harwood, Esq., Nora R. Healy, Esq. (orally), Verrill & Dana LLP, Portland, (for Biddeford & Saco Water Co.), for appellees.

Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, LEVY, and SILVER, JJ.

CLIFFORD, J.

[¶ 1] David Dunn appeals from a decision of the Public Utilities Commission authorizing the Biddeford and Saco Water Company (BSWC) to charge reinforcement fees pursuant to Commission Rule 650. The Commission reversed the decision of the Customer Assistance Division (CAD) in which CAD concluded that BSWC is not authorized to charge reinforcement fees. Dunn contends that Rule 650 does not authorize the imposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases