1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 134 P.3d
  5. 134 P.3d 999 (2006)
 

COURTEMANCHE v. MILLIGAN

18-05-08867; A128521.

134 P.3d 999 (2006)

205 Or. App. 244

Heidi Kirsten COURTEMANCHE, Respondent, v. Donald Ray MILLIGAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 26, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey E. Potter argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Gardner, Honsowetz, Potter, Budge & Ford.

James C. Jagger, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was James C. Jagger, P.C.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ORTEGA, Judges.

HASELTON, P.J.

Respondent, a mail carrier, appeals, challenging a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) obtained by petitioner, whose residence is on respondent's mail delivery route.1 On de novo review, Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or.App. 525, 537, 953 P.2d 1130 (1998), rev. den., 328 Or. 418, 987 P.2d 512 (1999), we determine that respondent's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases