1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 693 N.W.2d
  5. 693 N.W.2d 44 (2005)
 

HARRIMAN v. UNITED DOMINION INDUSTRIES

Nos. 23142, 23143.

693 N.W.2d 44 (2005)

2005 SD 18

John Carl HARRIMAN a/k/a Jack Harriman, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNITED DOMINION INDUSTRIES, INC.; United Dominion Industries, Limited; United Dominion Holdings, Inc.; Feterl Mfg. Co.; Core Industries, Inc. and SPX, Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided February 2, 2005.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Unke, Salem, South Dakota, Attorney for plaintiff and appellant.

Michael L. Luce, Cheryle Wiedmeier Gering of Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz and Smith, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendants and appellees.

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] John Carl Harriman entered into an oral agreement to sell service bodies for Feterl Manufacturing. The duration of the contract was never discussed by the parties. United Dominion Industries, Inc. (UDI) purchased Feterl Manufacturing and sought to reduce Harriman's commission structure. Dissatisfied with UDI's final commission proposal, Harriman resigned and brought suit alleging a joint venture between the parties, the wrongful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases