1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 24 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 24 Cal.Rptr.3d 351 (2005)
 

STEINHEBEL v. LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUN.

No. B172415.

24 Cal.Rptr.3d 351 (2005)

126 Cal.App.4th 696

Kurt STEINHEBEL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

Review Denied May 11, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thierman Law Firm, Mark R. Thierman, Micheline N. Fairbank; Hoffman & Lazear, H. Tim Hoffman, Arthur Lazear, Oakland; Law Offices of Eric M. Epstein and Eric M. Epstein, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Seyfarth Shaw, Kenneth D. Sulzer, and Thomas R. Kaufman, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.

FLIER, J.

Appellants, former "telesales" employees of respondent Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, appeal from a summary judgment issued on the ground it was lawful for respondent to contract with such employees to pay a commission upon the sale of a subscription immediately, subject to a charge-back if the customer did not keep the subscription for at least 28 days.

After reviewing pertinent law, we conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases