CICAIROS v. SUMMIT LOGISTICS, INC.

No. C048133.

35 Cal.Rptr.3d 243 (2005)

133 Cal.App.4th 949

Albert H. CICAIROS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SUMMIT LOGISTICS, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

October 27, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, David A. Rosenfeld, and Caren P. Sencer for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, David F. Faustman, Los Angeles, Lester F. Aponte, and Shea Lukacsko for Defendant and Respondent.


NICHOLSON, Acting P.J.

This appeal involves five plaintiffs who sued their former employer for violations of Labor Code and Industrial Welfare Commission wage order provisions relating to meal periods, rest breaks, and itemized wage statements. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendant. We conclude the trial court erred and therefore reverse.

PROCEDURE

The plaintiffs' complaint included claims for violation of (1) the meal period...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases