1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 127 P.3d
  5. 127 P.3d 138 (2005)
 

DAN WIEBOLD FORD, INC. v. UNIVERSAL COMPUTER CONSULTING HOLDING, INC.

No. 31136.

127 P.3d 138 (2005)

142 Idaho 235

DAN WIEBOLD FORD, INC., an Idaho corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL COMPUTER CONSULTING HOLDING, INC., Universal Computer Services, Inc., Universal Computer Systems, Inc., Universal Computer Consulting Ltd, and Dealer Computer Services, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2005 Term.

December 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Kerrick, Caldwell, and Blume & Stoddard, Dallas, Texas, for appellant. James D. Blume argued.

Holland & Hart, Boise, for respondents. Steven C. Bowman argued.

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint alleging violations of the Idaho Consumer Protection Act on the ground that the parties had entered into a contract that included a provision requiring them to arbitrate disputes between them. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 20, 1993, Dan Wiebold Ford, Inc., (Dan Wiebold) entered into a written contract (Agreement) with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases