1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 108 P.3d
  5. 108 P.3d 139 (2005)
 

MAZON v. KRAFCHICK

No. 53690-7-I.

108 P.3d 139 (2005)

126 Wash.App. 207

Michael E. MAZON, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Steven P. KRAFCHICK and Jane Doe Krafchick, husband and wife, Respondents/Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 7, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles N. Berry, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Joel E. Wright, Lee, Smart Cook et al, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

AGID, J.

¶ 1 Attorney Michael Mazon sued his co-counsel, Steven Krafchick, after they settled a malpractice claim brought against them by their mutual client. Krafchick had failed to serve the complaint on time. Mazon's primary claim was for $325,000, the contingent fee he expected to get had he and Krafchick successfully pursued their client's lawsuit. The trial court ruled that co-counsel could not sue one another for lost prospective fees. We agree and hold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases