1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 424 F.3d
  5. 424 F.3d 1374 (2005)
 

INVITROGEN CORP. v. BIOCREST MFG., L.P.

Nos. 04-1273, 04-1274.

424 F.3d 1374 (2005)

INVITROGEN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIOCREST MANUFACTURING, L.P., Stratagene Holding Corp., and Stratagene, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 5, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis M. Wikstrom, Parsons Behle & Latimer, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were C. Kevin Speirs and Kristine Edde Johnson. Of counsel on the brief was Alan W. Hammond, Invitrogen Corporation, of Carlsbad, California.

Marc R. Labgold, Patton Boggs LLP, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Scott A.M. Chambers and Kevin M. Bell; and Richard J. Oparil, of Washington, DC.

Before RADER, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

On remand from this court, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, on summary judgment, determined that Biocrest Manufacturing, L.P., Stratagene Holding Corporation, and Stratagene, Inc. (collectively Stratagene) infringed Invitrogen Corporation's (Invitrogen's) U.S. Patent No. 4,981,797 (issued Jan. 1, 1991) (the '797 patent), and that the '797 patent was not invalid for indefiniteness, although it was invalid because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases