1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 385 F.Supp.2d
  5. 385 F.Supp.2d 1030 (2005)
 

IMAX CORP. v. IN-THREE, INC.

No. CV05-1795FMC(MCX).

385 F.Supp.2d 1030 (2005)

IMAX CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. IN-THREE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

July 29, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Stephens Clay, Geoffrey K. Gavin, Mitchell G. Stockwell, R. Charles Henn, Jr., Susan A. Cahoon, Kilpatrick Stockton, Atlanta, GA, Chad S. Hummel, Noel Scott Cohen, Manatt Phelps & Phillips, Los Angeles, CA, James J. Hefferan, Jr., Tonya Deem, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, for Plaintiffs.

Heidi L. Keefe, Mark R. Weinstein, Samuel C. O'Rourke, William Sloan Coats, White and Case, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF THE REEXAMINATION OF THE U.S. PATENT NO. 4,925,294

COOPER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant In-Three, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Reexamination of U.S. Patent. No. 4,925,294 (docket no. 54), filed June 10, 2005. The Court, having read and considered the moving, opposition and reply documents submitted in connection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases