SHANKMAN v. STATE


876 A.2d 269 (2005)

184 N.J. 187

Stephen SHANKMAN, Plaintiff-Cross-Respondent, v. STATE of New Jersey, its agents, servants and employees, New Jersey Department of Transportation, its agents, servants and employees, Salvatore J. Mavuro, Jr., John Does 1-5, (said names being fictitious), ABC corporation 1-5 (said names being fictitious), and ABC Public Entities 1-5 (said names being fictitious), Defendants, and Conti Enterprises, its agents, servants and employees, Defendant-Cross-Appellant. Dora Shankman, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent, v. State of New Jersey, its agents, servants and employees, New Jersey Department of Transportation, its agents, servants and employees, Salvatore J. Mavuro, Jr., Stephen Shankman, John Does 1-5, (said names being fictitious), ABC Corporation 1-5 (said names being fictitious), and ABC Public Entities 1-5 (said names being fictitious), Defendants, and Conti Enterprises, its agents, servants and employees, Defendant-Respondent and Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 13, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth S. Javerbaum, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks & Zarin, attorneys).

William H. Mergner, Jr., Cedar Knolls, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Leary, Bride, Tinker & Moran, attorneys).

Stephanie Ann Mitterhoff, Scotch Plains, argued the cause for cross-respondent (Bramnick, Rodriguez, Mitterhoff, Grabas & Woodruff, attorneys).


Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a consolidated personal injury case involving claims by a husband and wife against multiple defendants. The posture of the appeal is influenced by the fact that the wife's claims included a count of negligence against her husband, the driver of the vehicle in which she was injured, that was settled prior to trial.

Chief among the issues raised before us...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases