1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 879 A.2d
  5. 879 A.2d 129 (2005)
 

BURSZTYN v. BURSZTYN

879 A.2d 129 (2005)

379 N.J. Super. 385

Miriam R. BURSZTYN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Enrique M. BURSZTYN, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Pitman, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Pitman, Pitman, Mindas, Grossman and Lee, attorneys; Mr. Pitman and Heidi V. Rivkin, on the brief).

Jay R. Atkins, River Edge, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Sunshine, Atkins, Minassian & Tafuri, attorneys; Mr. Atkins and Kristen Capogrosso, on the brief).

Before Judges A.A. RODRÍGUEZ, CUFF and WEISSBARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEISSBARD, J.A.D.

In this matrimonial litigation, plaintiff Miriam Bursztyn appeals and defendant Enrique M. Bursztyn cross-appeals from an order of the Family Part awarding alimony to plaintiff, ordering the equitable distribution of marital assets and liabilities, tieing defendant's future obligation for college expenses of the parties' younger son to his relationship with the son, compelling plaintiff to execute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases