1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 146 S.W.3d
  5. 146 S.W.3d 813 (2004)
 

MARY KAY INC. v. WOOLF

No. 05-03-01099-CV.

146 S.W.3d 813 (2004)

MARY KAY INC., Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Claudine WOOLF, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

October 20, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carlyle H. Chapman, Jr. and Cynthia Keely Timms, L.L.P., Ellen L. Perlioni, Baker & McKenzie, John F. McCarthy, Jr., Littler Mendelson, Dallas, for Appellant.

William M. Lamoreaux, Dallas, Pamela Pitt, Law Office of Pamela Pitt, Angela Alioto and Steven L. Robinson, San Francisco, CA, for Appellee.

Before Justices MORRIS, MOSELEY, and FITZGERALD.

OPINION

Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD.

Appellee Claudine Woolf was an independent sales director for Mary Kay Inc. in March 1997 when she learned she was pregnant with her first child. The same month, Woolf was diagnosed with cancer. Woolf ultimately brought suit against Mary Kay Inc. under a California statute, alleging Mary Kay failed to accommodate her disability. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Woolf, and the trial court's judgment adopted the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases