1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 301 F.Supp.2d
  5. 301 F.Supp.2d 403 (2004)
 

LIN v. ROHM AND HAAS CO.

No. Civ.A. 02-CV-3612.

301 F.Supp.2d 403 (2004)

Dr. Manhua Mandy LIN, Plaintiff, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

January 22, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh J. Hutchison, Leonard Tillery & Sciolla, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

Mari Shaw, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, LLP, Raymond A. Kresge, Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration or in the alternative, Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Because the Court did not decide the issue on the previous motion for summary judgment and because Plaintiff's responsive memorandum addresses the merits, we will decide the Motion on the merits. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases