Motions for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 777).
FRESCO v. 157 EAST 72ND STREET CONDOMINIUM
3 N.Y.3d 630 (2004)
RAMON FRESCO et al., Respondents, v. 157 EAST 72ND STREET CONDOMINIUM et al., Defendants, and DNA CONSTRUCTION CORP., Sued Herein as DNA CONSTRUCTION, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent. LUMAR RESTORATION CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant. (And Another Action.).
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted April 19, 2004.
Decided June 24, 2004.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.